French B2B email finder built specifically for LinkedIn Sales Navigator and Apollo users
Review by EuropeanStack EditorialUpdated Verified
Findymail is a focused tool that solves one problem with precision: getting verified, deliverable email addresses for contacts SDRs have already identified in Sales Navigator and Apollo. The double verification, one-click export, and Lemlist integration are specific, demonstrable improvements over the manual workflow they replace.
Findymail is a French B2B email finder and verifier built specifically for SDRs who use LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Apollo, and Lusha daily. Founded in 2022 by Valentin Wallyn and operated by Peanuts SaaS Studio, it reached $2,500 MRR within three months of launch and has grown as a bootstrapped product. It verifies each email when requested and guarantees a bounce rate below 5%, refunding credits if bounces run higher.
Headquarters
Capinghem, France
Founded
2022
Pricing
EU Data Hosting
Yes
Employees
1-10
Free
$49/mo
$99/mo
Contact Sales
$500/mo
Billing: monthly, annual
In May 2022, Valentin Wallyn launched Findymail as a side project. Within three months it was generating $2,500 MRR. That growth trajectory without advertising or a sales team is the most honest signal about what the product does. It solves a problem that a specific type of buyer experiences every day and pays to fix: SDRs who live in LinkedIn Sales Navigator and Apollo.
The problem is email finding. Sales Navigator surfaces rich prospect data (company, role, tenure, recent activity) but withholds email addresses behind a separate LinkedIn InMail system that most SDRs prefer to avoid. Apollo has a 250M+ contact database but its email accuracy degrades for smaller companies and non-English-speaking markets. Hunter.io works well for domain-level prospecting but poorly for lists of named individuals. The result is that SDRs spend material time cross-referencing tools to find deliverable emails for contacts they have already identified.
Findymail attacks this specific friction. Its one-click Sales Navigator export pulls verified emails directly from saved lead lists. For Apollo users, an enrichment layer takes Apollo contacts and adds verified emails. Its double-verification engine checks deliverability before export rather than after, so the credits buyers spend translate into usable addresses rather than bounced sends.
The contracting company is Peanuts SaaS Studio, a French SAS registered in Capinghem near Lille, which makes Findymail GDPR-native. Findymail describes itself as a remote-first team of 10 working a four-day week. As a bootstrapped company, it faces no VC-driven pricing experiments, and customer feedback feeds directly into product direction.
For European sales teams using Lemlist for outreach, Findymail's native Lemlist integration closes the loop between prospecting and sequencing without manual export steps.
Most email finders verify once: they check that an address conforms to a valid syntax and that the domain's mail server exists. Findymail verifies twice. The first check happens at the time of finding, the same as competitors. A second check runs immediately before export, confirming deliverability against current mail server configuration.
Why does this matter? Email infrastructure changes. A verified address on Monday can become a hard bounce by Friday if an employee leaves, a domain configuration changes, or a company migrates email providers. The second verification catches these time-sensitive changes before the email enters a sequence.
That supports Findymail's guarantee of a bounce rate below 5%, with credits refunded if bounces run higher. For cold outreach, where bounce rates above 5-8% trigger spam filters and damage sender domain reputation, this accuracy differential has meaningful downstream consequences. A sales team sending 1,000 emails at 95% deliverability faces 50 bounces. At 85% deliverability (common with unverified lists) they face 150 bounces, enough to materially harm inbox placement.
The Chrome extension is the feature most SDRs cite when explaining why they use Findymail. After saving a lead list in LinkedIn Sales Navigator, the extension adds an "Export with Findymail" button directly in the Sales Navigator interface. One click processes the visible contacts, matches them against Findymail's database and real-time verification layer, and returns a downloadable CSV or direct CRM push, all without leaving the browser.
The alternative workflow, without Findymail, involves manually copying names and companies, pasting into an email finder, waiting for results, cross-referencing against a verification tool, and assembling the final list. For SDRs prospecting at volume, the time saving per week is substantial.
The same pattern applies to Apollo enrichment. Apollo contacts, which include name, title, company, and LinkedIn URL but sometimes lack verified emails, can be bulk uploaded to Findymail for email resolution and double verification.
Findymail's integration list reflects where European SDRs actually work. The Lemlist connector is the most significant: verified emails from Findymail flow directly into Lemlist sequences without CSV export. This creates a complete prospecting-to-outreach pipeline where both tools are European-incorporated entities with French and French-adjacent legal structures.
Smartlead, Instantly, Outreach, Salesloft, HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive integrations cover the broader sequencing and CRM stack. Woodpecker, the Polish cold email platform, is another natural pairing. Cognism, the UK sales intelligence vendor, sits one tier up the stack for teams that need verified mobile numbers and intent data on top of email finding. Zapier and Make handle custom workflow requirements.
For the sales-engagement category specifically, Findymail positions as the data layer beneath the sequencing tools rather than a competitor to them.
Findymail's API and MCP server handle programmatic email finding and verification, and the company says connecting any integration is free. The primary use cases are CRM enrichment workflows (automatically finding emails for newly added contacts), product-led growth tooling (enriching trial signups with company and contact data), and sales operations teams that build custom data pipelines.
Its API is straightforward with well-documented endpoints. It is not trying to compete with ZoomInfo's enterprise data API in depth; it is designed for SDR-scale enrichment rather than enterprise data warehouse integration.
Credits are shared across team members rather than allocated per seat, so any combination of team members can draw on a plan's monthly allowance. An SDR running a targeted account list and a sales ops person enriching inbound leads share the same pool. This is a more practical credit model than tools that gate credits per user regardless of actual consumption patterns.
Team collaboration extends to shared export history and saved prospect lists, which reduces duplication when multiple SDRs are prospecting into the same account or industry.
Findymail's pricing is transparent and designed for self-serve adoption. A free account comes with 10 credits for initial testing, and no credit card is required.
The entry Basic plan costs $49/month for 1,000 finder credits. Starter, the plan Findymail recommends, costs $99/month for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 bonus verifier credits. One verified email costs 1 credit, and one phone number costs 10.
Higher volumes (15,000 to 100,000 credits a month) sit on a selector on the pricing page, and Enterprise covers custom volumes with automatic refill and a dedicated account manager. Yearly billing gives two months free. Unused credits roll over month to month, up to twice the monthly allowance.
Datacare, a separate CRM enrichment and hygiene product, starts at $500/month billed annually and is priced on CRM size. At those volumes, the comparison point shifts from Hunter.io to Apollo's bulk data plans or ZoomInfo's database access.
The credit model has one meaningful quirk: credits are consumed on verified results, not on lookup attempts. Failed lookups (no email found) do not consume credits. This is more buyer-friendly than tools that charge per lookup regardless of result.
Findymail's GDPR posture is clear and deliberate. The French entity processes only publicly available B2B contact data: business email addresses associated with professional roles at organisations. This is B2B contact enrichment, not consumer data harvesting. The distinction matters under GDPR's legitimate interest basis, which applies to B2B contact data more broadly than to consumer personal data.
Findymail provides a Data Processing Addendum for customers acting as data controllers under GDPR. It maintains opt-out lists and respects removal requests, and it does not resell user contact data or deploy user data for purposes beyond the stated enrichment service.
The LinkedIn scraping question deserves honest treatment. Findymail's Sales Navigator integration extracts data from LinkedIn's platform, which LinkedIn's terms of service nominally prohibit for automated extraction. In practice, Findymail operates in the same grey zone as Apollo, Lusha, and Kaspr, all of which are widely used by European sales teams. The legal risk sits primarily with LinkedIn enforcement against the user's account rather than with Findymail directly. Usage intensity and account standing affect this risk.
Dropcontact, another French email finder, takes a different approach: it says it keeps no contact database, finds emails algorithmically in real time, and is not a LinkedIn scraping tool. Teams with strict LinkedIn account compliance requirements should consider that trade-off.
If you are an SDR using LinkedIn Sales Navigator daily and want verified emails for named contacts without manual cross-referencing, Findymail is the most direct solution to that specific workflow. The one-click export is the feature that converts free trial users.
If you use Lemlist for outreach and want a French-French integration where data stays within EU-incorporated entities through the full prospecting-to-sending pipeline, the Findymail-Lemlist native connector makes this straightforward.
For a broad B2B database for market prospecting, where you are searching for contacts by title and industry rather than enriching a pre-existing list, Apollo or Hunter.io serve that use case more directly. Findymail is better for named-individual enrichment than discovery-from-scratch.
If you have strict LinkedIn policy requirements or manage LinkedIn accounts for an employer that monitors third-party automation, Dropcontact may be a safer alternative, though it typically returns fewer results for smaller companies. It says it keeps no contact database and does not scrape LinkedIn.
Findymail is a focused tool that solves one problem with precision: getting verified, deliverable email addresses for contacts SDRs have already identified in Sales Navigator and Apollo. The double verification, one-click export, and Lemlist integration are specific, demonstrable improvements over the manual workflow they replace.
Findymail's constraints are deliberate rather than accidental. No built-in sequencing, no EU phone numbers, a smaller database than Apollo. These are product decisions, not gaps, reflecting a view that email finding is a distinct problem from outreach execution. For SDRs who have already decided on their sequencing stack and need a reliable email finding layer, Findymail fits that role cleanly.
That a bootstrapped French team of 10 has built this following says something about how clearly the product-market fit lands with its target user. Bootstrapped European SaaS products rarely grow this way without genuine utility.
Yes. Findymail is operated by Peanuts SaaS Studio, a French SAS registered in Lille Métropole, and processes publicly available B2B contact data: professional email addresses associated with business roles. It provides a Data Processing Addendum, maintains opt-out lists, and does not resell user data. Consumer personal data is not collected or processed.
Findymail verifies each email in real time when it is requested and guarantees a bounce rate below 5%, refunding credits if bounces run higher. Credits are charged only for verified results, not failed lookups. In practice, accuracy varies by company size and geography. Coverage tends to be strongest for mid-market and enterprise accounts in Western Europe and North America, and weaker for smaller companies in less-covered markets.
Findymail's Sales Navigator integration extracts data from LinkedIn's platform, which LinkedIn's terms of service nominally prohibit for automated extraction. Findymail operates in the same practical grey zone as Apollo, Lusha, and Kaspr. The enforcement risk primarily falls on the LinkedIn account owner rather than Findymail. Users should evaluate their own LinkedIn account risk tolerance and consult LinkedIn's current terms before adopting high-volume scraping workflows.
Hunter.io is better for finding emails by searching a company domain, for example "who works at company.com" for account-based prospecting. Findymail is optimised for named-individual enrichment: finding the email address for a specific person already identified in Sales Navigator or Apollo. Hunter has a more generous free tier, while Findymail backs its results with a bounce-rate guarantee. Both companies are French.
Yes. Findymail lists native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM, Close, and Copper, plus sequencers including Lemlist, Smartlead, Instantly, Woodpecker, Outreach, and Salesloft. Clay, Zapier, Make, an API, and an MCP server cover custom workflows. Connecting an integration is free; Findymail charges credits only for the emails and phone numbers it finds.
GDPR-compliant B2B sales intelligence with phone-verified mobile data and Diamond Data
French B2B email finder that generates and verifies contacts in real time instead of selling a database
Paris-built LinkedIn prospecting extension for phone and email lookup, owned by Cognism and fined by the CNIL in 2024