Open-source workflow automation with a visual builder and AI agents
Activepieces is an open-source workflow automation platform offering a visual no-code builder for connecting apps and automating tasks. A Y Combinator (S22) graduate headquartered in San Francisco, it provides a self-hostable alternative to Zapier with 600+ integrations, AI agent capabilities, MCP server support, and EU cloud hosting via Hetzner infrastructure.
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2022
Pricing
EU Data Hosting
Yes
Employees
11-50
Open Source
Yes
Free
Pay-as-you-go
$25/mo
$150/mo
Contact Sales
Billing: monthly, annual
Zapier charges per task. Make charges per operation. At scale, both become expensive fast — a mid-sized team running a few dozen automations can easily burn through hundreds of euros per month on workflow tooling alone. Activepieces throws a grenade at that pricing model: $5 per active flow per month, unlimited runs included. Or self-host the entire thing for free under an MIT licence.
Founded in 2022 by Ashraf Samhouri and Mohammad AbuAboud, Activepieces emerged from Y Combinator's Summer 2022 batch as an open-source, no-code automation platform. The company is headquartered in San Francisco and incorporated as Activepieces Inc. — this is a US company, not a European one. That distinction matters for this directory, and we will address it directly in the compliance section below.
What makes Activepieces relevant for European teams isn't corporate domicile — it is the combination of open-source transparency, self-hosting capability, and cloud infrastructure that runs on Hetzner, a German provider with data centres in Nuremberg, Falkenstein, and Helsinki. For organisations that need automation tooling without sending workflow data to US servers, the self-hosted option eliminates the problem entirely. Your data never leaves your infrastructure.
The platform has grown rapidly, reaching over 600 integrations (called "pieces"), with more than 60% contributed by the open-source community. Over 300 contributors have shaped the codebase, and the project has accumulated significant traction on GitHub. For a tool that is barely three years old, the velocity is notable.
The core experience is a drag-and-drop canvas where you assemble automations from triggers and actions. A trigger — a webhook, a schedule, or an event from a connected app — kicks off the flow. Actions follow sequentially, with support for branching, conditional logic, loops, and error handling. The interface is clean and responsive, noticeably more modern than n8n's node-based editor and less cluttered than Make's scenario view.
For non-technical users, the builder is genuinely accessible. You can connect a Google Sheet to Slack notifications in under five minutes without touching code. For developers, custom code steps accept TypeScript and JavaScript, and the piece SDK lets you build entirely new integrations as npm packages with hot-reloading during development.
This is where Activepieces has leapfrogged much of the competition. The platform supports building custom AI agents that can execute multi-step workflows autonomously. Rather than exposing individual actions, you can package entire conditional workflows into a single tool that an AI agent calls as needed.
More significantly, Activepieces has embraced the Model Context Protocol (MCP), offering approximately 280 pieces as MCP servers that can be consumed by external AI tools like Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf. This positions Activepieces not just as an automation tool, but as an infrastructure layer for AI-assisted work — a strategic bet that could pay off substantially as MCP adoption grows.
Automation without oversight is automation waiting to fail. Activepieces addresses this with To-Do actions that pause workflows for human approval before proceeding, and input triggers that collect data from chat interfaces or forms built directly into flows. For teams automating processes that involve financial approvals, content publishing, or customer-facing actions, this is a practical necessity rather than a nice-to-have.
Every integration in Activepieces is a "piece" — an npm package written in TypeScript. The SDK is well-documented and includes hot-reloading for local development, meaning you can build, test, and publish custom integrations without deploying anything. This is a meaningful advantage over platforms like Zapier, where custom integrations require navigating a more restrictive developer platform. The open-source nature means community-contributed pieces undergo public review and iteration.
For SaaS companies that want to offer automation features to their own customers, Activepieces Embed provides a white-label version of the builder starting at $30,000 per year. This is a niche but high-value offering — it lets product teams ship workflow automation as a native feature without building the infrastructure from scratch.
Activepieces' pricing is its most immediately compelling argument. The cloud Standard plan starts free with 10 active flows, then charges $5 per additional active flow per month — with unlimited task executions included. Compare this to Zapier, where the Starter plan costs $29.99/month for 750 tasks across 20 Zaps, and you begin to see why Activepieces positions itself as a 90% cost reduction.
The Plus plan at $25/month and Business at $150/month add team features, priority support, and advanced permissions. The Ultimate enterprise tier is custom-priced annually and unlocks SSO, custom RBAC, audit logs, and Git Sync — features that larger organisations will consider essential.
All cloud plans charge $1 per 1,000 task executions on top of the per-flow pricing, which keeps costs predictable but adds a variable component worth modelling at high volume.
The self-hosted Community Edition is free under the MIT licence with no task or flow limits. This is the option that makes Activepieces most attractive to European organisations with strict data sovereignty requirements — you pay nothing for the software and control every aspect of the deployment.
For small-to-mid teams running 20-50 automations, cloud costs land in the $50-$200/month range. On Zapier, the same workload could easily cost $500-$1,000/month depending on task volume. The savings are real and substantial.
Here is where honesty is required. Activepieces Inc. is a US corporation headquartered in San Francisco. There is no European subsidiary, no GmbH, no EU-registered legal entity. For organisations that require contracts with a European counterparty — common in government procurement and regulated industries — this is a genuine limitation.
That said, the technical compliance picture is considerably stronger than the corporate structure suggests. Activepieces Cloud is SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant. The cloud offering runs on Hetzner infrastructure with EU data region options, meaning workflow data can be processed and stored entirely within German data centres. Data is encrypted with 256-bit protection at rest and in transit, and logs automatically redact sensitive information.
For organisations that self-host, the compliance question becomes moot for the software layer — your data never touches Activepieces' servers. You deploy on your own EU infrastructure, under your own data processing agreements, with full audit capability over the open-source codebase.
The bottom line: Activepieces is technically capable of meeting GDPR requirements through EU hosting or self-hosting, but the US corporate structure means it cannot offer the same jurisdictional guarantees as a Make (Czech Republic) or n8n (Germany). For many teams, the self-hosted option resolves this entirely. For regulated enterprises requiring a European legal entity, it remains a gap.
Cost-conscious teams currently paying Zapier or Make prices that scale faster than their budgets. The per-flow pricing model is a genuine breakthrough for teams running high-volume automations.
DevOps and engineering teams that want to self-host automation infrastructure alongside their existing stack, with full code-level control via the TypeScript SDK.
AI-forward organisations experimenting with AI agents and MCP-based tooling. Activepieces' early investment in MCP support gives it a structural advantage in this emerging space.
SaaS companies looking to embed automation features into their own products without building from scratch. The Embed product addresses a specific and underserved market.
Activepieces delivers a remarkable amount of capability for a platform that is barely three years old. The pricing undercuts incumbents dramatically, the open-source model provides genuine transparency and self-hosting freedom, and the AI agent and MCP features show strategic foresight. The integration library at 600+ pieces is credible and growing fast.
The caveats are real. The US headquarters and absence of a European legal entity disqualify it for some procurement processes. The team is small — under 20 people — which means enterprise support depth is limited. And the platform is young enough that some rough edges remain in documentation and edge-case handling.
For European teams that can self-host or accept US-incorporated SaaS with EU-hosted data, Activepieces offers the best value proposition in workflow automation today. For those requiring a European-headquartered vendor, look to Make or n8n instead.
Yes. The Community Edition is released under the MIT licence — one of the most permissive open-source licences available. You can inspect, modify, fork, and distribute the code freely. Enterprise features (SSO, RBAC, audit logs) are under a separate commercial licence. The vast majority of pieces (integrations) are MIT-licensed and community-contributed.
Both are open-source, self-hostable automation platforms. n8n uses a node-based visual editor and emphasises a "code-when-you-need-it" approach, while Activepieces offers a more linear flow builder that may feel simpler for non-technical users. n8n is headquartered in Berlin (Germany) and has a larger integration catalogue. Activepieces has stronger AI agent and MCP support, and its per-flow cloud pricing is more predictable than n8n's execution-based model.
The self-hosted edition can scale to enterprise requirements with appropriate infrastructure — Kubernetes deployments, PostgreSQL clustering, and load balancing are all supported. The Ultimate cloud plan adds governance features. However, the company's small team size means enterprise support capacity is limited compared to established vendors. Evaluate carefully whether your organisation needs dedicated account management.
Cloud users can choose between EU and US data regions. EU data is hosted on Hetzner infrastructure in Germany. Self-hosted users control data storage entirely — Activepieces uses PostgreSQL and Redis, deployable on any infrastructure you choose. All cloud data is encrypted at rest and in transit with 256-bit encryption.
No. Activepieces Inc. is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and incorporated in the United States. It graduated from Y Combinator (S22) and is backed by US-based investors including Accel. The platform offers EU data hosting via Hetzner and is GDPR compliant, but it is not a European company. For a European-headquartered alternative in the same category, consider Make (Czech Republic) or n8n (Germany).
Self-hostable open-source workflow automation built in Berlin — no vendor lock-in, no per-task pricing
Alternative to Zapier