AI-native contract lifecycle management, rebranded from Pocketlaw for the enterprise
Review by EuropeanStack EditorialUpdated Verified
Miramis is a genuinely capable AI-native CLM platform mid-transition, and that transition is the whole story right now. PLAI's grounding in a company's own playbooks and Delegation of Authority is a smart, specific AI application, not a generic chatbot bolted onto a document store. The cross-functional workflow design addresses a real operational problem. A February 2026 rebrand from a self-serve product to an enterprise sales motion is a lot to absorb at once for a company this size. The loss of published pricing makes it harder for prospective buyers to self-qualify. Miramis is worth evaluating, with the explicit understanding that you are buying into a company still proving out its second act.
Miramis is a Stockholm-based, AI-native contract lifecycle management platform covering drafting, negotiation, e-signature, repository, and obligation tracking in one system. The company traded as Pocketlaw from its 2018 founding by Olga Beck-Friis and Kira Unger until a rebrand to Miramis Technologies on 11 February 2026, marking its shift from self-serve startup tooling to enterprise CLM sold to Legal, Sales, HR, and Procurement teams.
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Founded
2018
Pricing
EU Data Hosting
No
Employees
11-50
Contact Sales
Contact Sales
Contact Sales
Billing: annual
Most companies operate for years without a general counsel. The person actually handling contracts is often an ops lead, a finance manager, or a founder's assistant, working from templates nobody has reviewed since the company was three people in a shared office. That arrangement holds until contract volume outgrows ad hoc handling, and the company still is not ready to hire in-house legal. Miramis, formerly Pocketlaw, was built for exactly that gap — a system where risk tolerance and drafting playbooks live inside the software itself, rather than in one overworked person's memory.
If the name is unfamiliar, that is because it is new. The company traded as Pocketlaw from its founding in Stockholm in 2018 by Olga Beck-Friis and Kira Unger through 11 February 2026, when it rebranded to Miramis Technologies. This change was not just a new logo. Pocketlaw started as self-serve legal software for startups — templates and basic e-signature, sold with a credit card and no sales call. Miramis represents a deliberate pivot upmarket: enterprise contract lifecycle management, sold through a sales-led process, aimed at companies with dedicated legal, procurement, and HR functions rather than founders doing their own paperwork.
That history matters for anyone researching the product today. Search "Pocketlaw reviews" and you will still find years of G2 and Capterra history under the old name, describing a different product at a different price point for a different buyer. Miramis is the same legal entity — Pocket Solutions AB, based in Stockholm — but a materially different pitch.
The funding history is entirely European. Kinnevik backed an early round, and Atomico led a EUR 10 million Series A in May 2022, bringing total disclosed funding to roughly EUR 14 million by that point, followed by a smaller internal round. For a legal-tech buyer weighing vendor independence, that cap table matters as much as the product roadmap: no US private equity, no Delaware holding company, just Swedish and pan-European capital behind a Swedish entity.
Miramis's AI assistant, PLAI, does not answer generic legal questions. It reviews contracts against a company's own playbooks and its Delegation of Authority, flags terms that fall outside approved parameters, compares clauses across a portfolio, and answers natural-language questions about contracts already in the system. The distinction matters: PLAI is scoped to what your organisation has actually agreed to, not what a generic model thinks is reasonable.
This is Miramis's structural answer to the coordination problem. Sales, HR, and Procurement teams get pre-approved templates and automated approval routing, so a standard NDA or vendor agreement does not need to sit in legal's inbox for three days. Legal retains oversight through the approval workflow rather than through manual review of every document. A growing sales team, for instance, can send a standard order form for signature the same day a deal closes, with legal's playbook enforced automatically rather than checked clause by clause after the fact.
Miramis includes eIDAS-compliant e-signature built into the platform, rather than bolted on through a third-party integration. It pairs that with a centralised, AI-searchable contract repository and a Microsoft Word add-in that keeps documents synced as they move between the two tools.
The negotiation workspace replaces the version-control chaos of emailed Word documents with a shared space for redlining and commenting, a small but real improvement for any team that has ever lost track of which "Contract_v7_FINAL_FINAL.docx" is actually current.
Pricing is another casualty of the Pocketlaw-to-Miramis pivot. The old self-serve plans, priced for startups and available without a sales call, are gone. Its pricing page now lists three offerings — CLM Platform, Miramis AI, and Combined Power — each described only in features. Every path on that page ends in a "get a demo" button rather than a number.
For a company with an estimated 28-45 employees, that shift toward enterprise sales is a notable strategic risk as much as a pricing change. It means Miramis is now competing for the same procurement conversations as much larger, better-resourced CLM vendors like Ironclad, without the same scale of customer-success and sales teams to run those conversations at volume. Prospective buyers should ask directly how implementation and onboarding compare to a larger competitor before assuming parity. They should also ask what happens to legacy Pocketlaw contracts and support commitments during the transition, since a rebrand this recent inevitably leaves some customers mid-migration.
Miramis is built on genuinely European foundations: Swedish-incorporated, funded by Atomico and Kinnevik rather than US venture capital, and describing itself as "GDPR-native" by virtue of its EU-member headquarters. The company holds ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type II compliance. It also states contractually that customer data is not used to train or fine-tune AI models — a specific, checkable commitment rather than a vague privacy promise.
What is missing from the public site is a stated data-hosting region. "GDPR-native" describes the company's legal posture, not necessarily where servers physically sit. Firms with strict EU-only data-residency requirements should ask Miramis directly for its hosting location and get it in writing rather than assuming it from the company's Swedish HQ alone.
Mid-market companies scaling contract volume across departments are the clearest fit, since cross-functional self-serve workflows solve exactly the coordination bottleneck that grows as headcount does.
Organisations that want all-European ownership in their legal-tech stack, from investors to incorporation, will find Miramis's Atomico-and-Kinnevik-backed, Stockholm-headquartered structure a clean fit against US-funded alternatives like Ironclad.
Teams evaluating based on G2 or Capterra reviews should specifically search under both "Pocketlaw" and "Miramis," since years of user feedback sit under the old name and may not reflect the current enterprise-focused product.
Very small teams or solo practitioners who valued Pocketlaw's old self-serve, credit-card pricing should look elsewhere now, since that entry point no longer appears to exist post-rebrand.
Legal teams already running Ironclad or a similarly established CLM should weigh switching costs carefully. Miramis's PLAI agent and all-European ownership are genuine differentiators, but a mid-transition vendor is a bigger commitment than a mature incumbent for a team that cannot absorb implementation risk right now.
Miramis is a genuinely capable AI-native CLM platform mid-transition, and that transition is the whole story right now. PLAI's grounding in a company's own playbooks and Delegation of Authority is a smart, specific AI application, not a generic chatbot bolted onto a document store. The cross-functional workflow design addresses a real operational problem. A February 2026 rebrand from a self-serve product to an enterprise sales motion is a lot to absorb at once for a company this size. The loss of published pricing makes it harder for prospective buyers to self-qualify. Miramis is worth evaluating, with the explicit understanding that you are buying into a company still proving out its second act.
Yes. Pocketlaw rebranded to Miramis Technologies on 11 February 2026 as part of a shift from self-serve startup legal tooling toward enterprise-grade contract lifecycle management. The underlying legal entity, Pocket Solutions AB, and its Stockholm HQ are unchanged; only the product name and enterprise positioning are new.
Miramis describes itself as GDPR-native, reflecting its Swedish, EU-member headquarters. It holds ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type II compliance, and states contractually that customer data is not used to train or fine-tune AI models. The specific hosting region for customer data is not published, so EU-only residency should be confirmed directly with the vendor.
Both are AI-native CLM platforms covering the full contract lifecycle, but Miramis is considerably smaller and more recently repositioned for enterprise, while Ironclad has a longer enterprise track record. Buyers comparing the two should weigh Miramis's all-European ownership and PLAI AI agent against Ironclad's larger scale and integration catalogue.
No public free tier or self-serve trial is currently advertised on miramis.co. Pricing across all three plans — CLM Platform, Miramis AI, and Combined Power — is quoted only after booking a demo.
PLAI is Miramis's AI contract agent. It reviews contracts against a company's own playbooks and Delegation of Authority, flags risk, compares clauses across a contract portfolio, and answers natural-language questions about existing contracts. That is a narrower, more specific use case than the general legal research Harvey targets. For contract review specifically inside Microsoft Word, see also our Definely review and the wider legal tech category.
AI knowledge search that turns a law firm's own work product into institutional intelligence
Alternative to Glean